Skip to content

DABLOCK MONTHLY · 2026-09

Covered vs named: 2026-09

Answer. Of the 10 tracked brands with confirmed press coverage in our 4-outlet monitored set this window, Coinbase led press attention (4 of 4 outlets) while being named in 28 of 48 prompt-engine cells of our index measured 2026-08-31. 0 brands were covered by the press yet named in zero cells. Every number below carries its denominator; the raw evidence for this issue is frozen at evidence.json.

Covered vs named

Brands with at least one confirmed story in the monitored set, sorted by press attention — not by score. Cells = prompts on which an engine named the brand, summed over 3 engines; 95% Wilson interval on that count. No brand-vs-brand verdicts: overlapping intervals are ties.
BrandOutletsStories Named, cells95% CIRank
Coinbase4 of 42228 of 4844.3-71.2%#1
Kraken4 of 4918 of 4825.2-51.6%#3
Binance4 of 4419 of 4827.0-53.7%#2
Trezor3 of 41113 of 4816.6-41.0%#5
Ledger3 of 4718 of 4825.2-51.6%#4
MetaMask3 of 4512 of 4814.9-38.8%#6
Chainalysis2 of 433 of 482.1-16.8%#19
Arbitrum1 of 4312 of 4814.9-38.8%#7
Polygon1 of 4212 of 4814.9-38.8%#8
MoonPay1 of 422 of 481.2-14.0%#22

The two gaps

Covered but named nowhere: none.

Named by engines, no story in our monitored set: Aave, CertiK, CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap, CoinTracker, DefiLlama, Etherscan, Koinly, Lido, OpenSea — the wording matters: «no story in our monitored set», never «released nothing».

AI crawlers on our own origin — the block that exists nowhere else

Daily IP-verified journal, 2026-09. Live sessions are counted only when the request matched the vendor's published IP ranges (Applebot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, Perplexity-User, PerplexityBot); requests with no feed to check against are reported separately, never as confirmed. GA4-class analytics cannot see any of this: AI crawlers execute no JavaScript.
DomainDaysLive, verified Live, unverifiableRejected as spoofed Crawlers
dablock.ai13571825021497

What we could not measure, and how to re-check