Skip to content

DABLOCK MONTHLY · 2026-11

Covered vs named: 2026-11

Answer. Of the 10 tracked brands with confirmed press coverage in our 4-outlet monitored set this window, Binance led press attention (4 of 4 outlets) while being named in 7 of 32 prompt-engine cells of our index measured 2026-11-02. 0 brands were covered by the press yet named in zero cells. Every number below carries its denominator; the raw evidence for this issue is frozen at evidence.json.

Covered vs named

Brands with at least one confirmed story in the monitored set, sorted by press attention — not by score. Cells = prompts on which an engine named the brand, summed over 2 engines; 95% Wilson interval on that count. No brand-vs-brand verdicts: overlapping intervals are ties.
BrandOutletsStories Named, cells95% CIRank
Binance4 of 41447 of 3211.0-38.8%#2
Coinbase4 of 4228 of 3213.3-42.1%#1
Ledger4 of 4166 of 328.9-35.3%#4
Polygon3 of 482 of 321.7-20.1%#16
Kraken3 of 467 of 3211.0-38.8%#3
Chainalysis2 of 442 of 321.7-20.1%#18
Aave1 of 422 of 321.7-20.1%#15
Arbitrum1 of 416 of 328.9-35.3%#5
Phantom1 of 412 of 321.7-20.1%#13
Uniswap1 of 412 of 321.7-20.1%#14

The two gaps

Covered but named nowhere: none.

Named by engines, no story in our monitored set: CertiK, CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap, CoinTracker, DefiLlama, Koinly, Lido, MetaMask, OpenSea, OpenZeppelin — the wording matters: «no story in our monitored set», never «released nothing».

AI crawlers on our own origin — the block that exists nowhere else

Daily IP-verified journal, 2026-11. Live sessions are counted only when the request matched the vendor's published IP ranges (Applebot, ChatGPT-User, ClaudeBot, GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, Perplexity-User, PerplexityBot); requests with no feed to check against are reported separately, never as confirmed. GA4-class analytics cannot see any of this: AI crawlers execute no JavaScript.
DomainDaysLive, verified Live, unverifiableRejected as spoofed Crawlers
dablock.ai20006

What we could not measure, and how to re-check